Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopper  Sorry but IMO he deserved it, obviously he was in a position to have access to commercially sensitive information, he chose to give that information to the press.
His position was untenable once he had breached the companies confidentiality standards.
Whether he was morally right or wrong is (IMO) not an issue, if he wanted to 'publish and be dammed' he should have done so from outside to companies employment.
Surely employers are allowed to expect some sort of loyalty for the salaries they pay? |
Sadly I believe this was the excuse used by a lot of Nazis in WW2, I don't believe in loyalty to a dubious cause, it delivers far too much power into the hands of those unfit to use it.